{"id":"W2133732759","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00599.x","title":"The Effects of Coaching on Situational Judgment Tests in High‐stakes Selection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","topic":"Medical Education and Admissions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coaching; Psychology; Covariate; Situational ethics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Applied psychology; Matching (statistics); Propensity score matching; Personnel selection; Social psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005185698,0.00006570515,0.0001203007,0.0001957622,0.00006648363,0.00002048987,0.00005113408,0.00003418194,0.0001376214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008841201,0.00004215391,0.00004342982,0.000114329,0.00002308695,0.0001112309,0.000009242444,0.0002922621,0.000001071004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002173715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003660158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001674534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007620282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988581,0.00007143744,0.0003473973,0.0000585097,0.0005649525,0.00009962891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998827,0.0004201696,0.0002481026,0.00002833195,0.0002714611,0.0002049397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001106598,0.005936568,0.5711716,0.0001558172,0.0007759547,0.00001538637,0.001679524,0.0003019588,0.1135982,0.05693245,0.008370903,0.239955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00195574,0.0007092212,0.9724101,0.0004637693,0.00004520901,0.0002143093,0.0003533295,0.0007870696,0.0098548,0.0004088233,0.01273195,0.00006564222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863347,0.0001776972,0.001281889,0.009851413,0.001532919,0.0001321516,6.685494e-7,0.00000524191,0.0006833254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972249,0.0002521789,0.001188075,0.0006284319,0.0004525837,0.000005627282,0.000003448866,0.000004720856,0.0002399945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4012385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1718987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01901983089422132,"score_gpt":0.3814197731038781,"score_spread":0.3623999422096568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}