{"id":"W2133775169","doi":"10.1007/s00216-003-2034-7","title":"Evaluation and applications of a gaseous mercuric chloride source","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chemistry; Chloride; Mercury (programming language); Analytical Chemistry (journal); Gaseous diffusion; Diffusion; Particulates; Environmental chemistry; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry; Electrode; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004569165,0.0001114107,0.0001793197,0.00001438819,0.00008017718,0.000015333,0.00005074848,0.0000638473,0.001647045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003467211,0.00008830631,0.00004476227,0.0002471699,0.0005386998,0.0000469055,0.00005798334,0.00008310606,0.00002294171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000315296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001584007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002727599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003443588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989617,0.00002729181,0.0002198492,0.0002478109,0.0003729261,0.0001704422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994703,0.000108762,0.0000494551,0.0001378181,0.0000362627,0.0001974062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002265012,0.002185746,0.448167,0.0009416532,0.001622379,0.00002170814,0.00129613,0.000343128,0.1114925,0.02446643,0.006043115,0.4031937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006463914,0.0005017609,0.08962588,0.0001712808,0.008507845,0.0005740451,0.004913994,0.1405075,0.4016617,0.07955699,0.2640579,0.00345722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9108068,0.0004707148,0.001939398,0.000410802,0.000007954462,0.0002017072,0.00000760944,0.00002052018,0.08613444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998566,0.00009517954,0.0001017436,0.00008173511,0.0000223619,0.00001438765,0.000003302044,0.000004659543,0.001110608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3997365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01552052731388071,"score_gpt":0.2689855640735657,"score_spread":0.253465036759685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}