{"id":"W2133841329","doi":"10.1111/j.1526-100x.2012.00889.x","title":"A New Approach for Tracking Vegetation Change after Restoration: A Case Study with Peatlands","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Natural Resources Limited","keywords":"Ruderal species; Species richness; Peat; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Restoration ecology; Species evenness; Indicator species; Habitat; Wetland; Plant community; Species diversity; Bog; Biodiversity; Gamma diversity; Biology; Beta diversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004211614,0.0001473935,0.0001820963,0.00007027941,0.0002046186,0.00003410675,0.00007456366,0.000118322,0.0002653537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002904188,0.0001213542,0.00003042562,0.0001827132,0.00004223454,0.0006927245,0.00003620272,0.00008969419,0.00004960017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001842297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002645213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000300931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009537773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988837,0.0001338033,0.0002133793,0.0002913955,0.0001306799,0.000347031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994385,0.00006837193,0.000125536,0.0001989502,0.00002137105,0.0001472898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002309215,0.0003593492,0.9890632,0.000009905923,0.00001877939,0.00008549896,0.005754432,0.0003229791,0.00004105873,0.00004096975,0.001219744,0.00285316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001980757,0.001563228,0.9856254,0.00000256844,0.00008592097,0.0009301113,0.001073388,0.00249172,0.00001205715,0.0000294388,0.005952356,0.000253051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.974474,0.000040687,0.02268567,0.000200824,0.0001980192,0.001344433,0.000002258776,0.00004513625,0.001008954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992199,0.000002115286,0.005513615,0.000210904,0.0005187869,0.001070619,0.00008435715,0.0000177971,0.0003828308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01772496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5322301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04255235934391544,"score_gpt":0.2788398566225441,"score_spread":0.2362874972786286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}