{"id":"W2133841329","doi":"10.1111/j.1526-100x.2012.00889.x","title":"A New Approach for Tracking Vegetation Change after Restoration: A Case Study with Peatlands","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Natural Resources Limited","keywords":"Ruderal species; Species richness; Peat; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Restoration ecology; Species evenness; Indicator species; Habitat; Wetland; Plant community; Species diversity; Bog; Biodiversity; Gamma diversity; Biology; Beta diversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001681708,0.000397375,0.0002784161,0.001395875,0.000838096,0.0005921611,0.0005643498,0.000625364,0.0006685656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00206427,0.0001452779,0.0003350612,0.00106932,0.0006056261,0.0007058824,0.0006644932,0.0004105549,0.0001248945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006704822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000462418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04325896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994036,0.0002822984,0.00003069234,0.0001057253,0.0001055733,0.00007206991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986571,0.0005712378,0.0002091011,0.000181545,0.0002141911,0.0001668698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005412354,0.002151035,0.6483949,0.0008316241,0.0001641937,0.02390622,0.03863345,0.009016315,0.03082962,0.001584466,0.001458492,0.2424885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003588832,0.001925424,0.872879,0.0002451105,0.0001864318,0.00967137,0.04847468,0.02878389,0.01633458,0.002153175,0.01915759,0.0001529086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930488,0.0001861015,0.005244569,0.00007205454,0.000009065792,0.0001021883,0.0001348215,0.00003450347,0.001167934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689077,0.0002706738,0.02936882,0.00002837155,0.00001282069,0.00007422923,0.0001395892,0.00001991989,0.001177898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01970899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04255235934391544,"score_gpt":0.2788398566225441,"score_spread":0.2362874972786286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}