{"id":"W2133866400","doi":"10.1007/s10584-009-9656-5","title":"Assessment of community preference rankings of potential environmental effects of climate change using the method of paired comparisons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climatic Change","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Wildlife; Geography; Climate change; Preference; Population; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Socioeconomics; Environmental science; Ecology; Demography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0134405,0.0005641873,0.00105799,0.002697486,0.00113764,0.001199597,0.0009534109,0.0006695176,0.0077882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04606032,0.0002707895,0.001103268,0.001479941,0.0009902786,0.001524569,0.001805981,0.001407964,0.0003617766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005144022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005373178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006237214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00181753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843345,0.01124908,0.0006920933,0.0009482488,0.002328194,0.0004478454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599806,0.03298407,0.001250047,0.002426503,0.002572457,0.0007863082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03615882,0.004555481,0.1952759,0.001877378,0.00491548,0.0006136436,0.005781625,0.01580807,0.06544001,0.01677309,0.005969262,0.6468312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001866185,0.04052339,0.6048701,0.0002216571,0.001808789,0.002242712,0.0192053,0.1890286,0.04973784,0.07887781,0.01095908,0.0006584284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8964712,0.0001311865,0.0958488,0.00008342811,0.0001545235,0.0004438757,0.000993163,0.0001843682,0.005689401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241039,0.00004701827,0.07380043,0.00003034929,0.00002870709,0.0005927923,0.0007017092,0.00003213006,0.0006628659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07108098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07796476558127963,"score_gpt":0.3443602646672985,"score_spread":0.2663954990860189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}