{"id":"W2133866400","doi":"10.1007/s10584-009-9656-5","title":"Assessment of community preference rankings of potential environmental effects of climate change using the method of paired comparisons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climatic Change","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Wildlife; Geography; Climate change; Preference; Population; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Socioeconomics; Environmental science; Ecology; Demography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001112913,0.0001743349,0.000480777,0.00004600537,0.0001348351,0.000004028104,0.0003993438,0.00007087622,0.0003740096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004558896,0.0001389201,0.0001488819,0.0001813058,0.0006078062,0.0001606229,0.0003214873,0.0001920344,0.000001555835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001979017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009077259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006309739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001692171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978307,0.0007046878,0.0006051118,0.0001581275,0.0004529538,0.0002483604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983311,0.0002912763,0.0006868324,0.0006221601,0.000008045253,0.0000605822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001125448,0.007580211,0.5462553,0.002698723,0.00008496829,0.000001621056,0.05951754,0.0005072798,0.3272312,0.0004660378,0.00004066851,0.05550386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005086844,0.0003584985,0.9727623,0.0001108127,0.0001130771,0.000002787557,0.005838492,0.006530003,0.01331323,0.0003394155,0.000009210597,0.0001134454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960374,0.00007261632,0.002187112,0.0001632861,0.00006726642,0.001068778,0.00004197318,0.000007049348,0.0003545331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990624,0.0001158006,0.009059658,0.0001205353,0.00001133881,0.000039795,0.00001594453,0.000009382327,0.000003606721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.426507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5664996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07796476558127963,"score_gpt":0.3443602646672985,"score_spread":0.2663954990860189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}