{"id":"W2134117464","doi":"10.1016/s1085-6633(00)00026-7","title":"A Prudential Argument for Precaution under Uncertainty and High Risk","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & the Environment","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001925739,0.00008316533,0.00007027289,0.00001454286,0.001194137,0.00007371698,0.0001386004,0.0001064487,0.002307663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002789809,0.00006250836,0.00004700318,0.00003028044,0.0003721292,0.00006022166,0.00004180695,0.0002351194,0.0001335135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001794148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002561966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002619973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000971984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986687,0.0003716532,0.0001263638,0.0002066418,0.0004222535,0.0002043669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995288,0.0001755143,0.00005260157,0.0001724348,0.000006285172,0.00006434739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001639404,0.0004702858,0.0006162052,0.00003110923,0.0002143144,9.81757e-7,0.1831366,0.07504079,0.0001606538,0.2937931,0.008633475,0.4377386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004358101,0.00006297526,0.01367255,0.000007008257,0.00007548589,1.138323e-7,0.004643681,0.0005344987,0.00001297162,0.0378204,0.9426091,0.0001254548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8695642,0.0002523587,0.02657876,0.09346558,0.0005306365,0.002479653,0.00003379516,0.00009767451,0.006997314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973555,0.00909193,0.0005070972,0.001246565,0.0001773123,0.0001385054,0.000009006997,0.000008521057,0.01526611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9339756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0312638699210426,"score_gpt":0.3138647682863571,"score_spread":0.2826008983653145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}