{"id":"W2134117464","doi":"10.1016/s1085-6633(00)00026-7","title":"A Prudential Argument for Precaution under Uncertainty and High Risk","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & the Environment","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01427925,0.000640856,0.0009310872,0.001914893,0.003088667,0.005186364,0.001940302,0.01372139,0.005535618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05491628,0.0006095756,0.001030616,0.0008686482,0.02665516,0.00863434,0.004308539,0.01008194,0.0005347989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002675494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002435625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001304599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001077748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873345,0.006235906,0.000592095,0.001346185,0.003398072,0.001093138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9592669,0.0299876,0.003420878,0.003602719,0.002578375,0.001143506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002551249,0.00002387392,0.0002621241,0.00002459227,0.00001418722,0.00009923929,0.000354681,0.0005526958,0.00005167592,0.9943389,0.001557082,0.002695462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001268864,0.000008195911,0.0001706805,0.00002071973,0.000005032297,0.00006337927,0.00007836011,0.0005779277,0.00004886006,0.9965087,0.002499932,0.000005527314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.074225,0.003399011,0.1960318,0.38073,0.001688018,0.0001970812,0.0002273403,0.0000862572,0.3434154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667063,0.0003438586,0.01410112,0.01150061,0.001011863,0.0001968186,0.00001774419,0.00001787746,0.006103734],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01427925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07551676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0312638699210426,"score_gpt":0.3138647682863571,"score_spread":0.2826008983653145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}