{"id":"W2134163741","doi":"10.1109/ijcnn.2004.1379927","title":"Connectionist based Dempster-Shafer evidential reasoning for data fusion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Neural Networks and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dempster–Shafer theory; Evidential reasoning approach; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Connectionism; Benchmark (surveying); Machine learning; Artificial neural network; Process (computing); Case-based reasoning; Realization (probability); Sensor fusion; Voting; Convergence (economics); Decision support system; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002498768,0.0006433198,0.000819754,0.0008634495,0.0006442306,0.001384358,0.001416451,0.001257842,0.001827899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00583532,0.0003634709,0.000807594,0.001050144,0.0009838106,0.002233398,0.001290921,0.001583901,0.0003436684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001208999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009722261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001608757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002512712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999199,0.0002738911,0.00007702353,0.000109227,0.0003064686,0.00003442807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984604,0.0009168045,0.0001344159,0.0001933885,0.0002606685,0.00003440869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009428597,0.00005551282,0.0005659673,0.0001743291,0.0001222956,0.0001979288,0.0001165902,0.7137812,0.003650447,0.1711679,0.001230139,0.1088434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004435675,0.00001353098,0.0000743243,0.000006327827,0.000007877226,0.000029028,0.000004525927,0.9482763,0.001029946,0.05011449,0.0004310737,0.000008110854],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006133869,0.0002314885,0.9917982,0.0001526946,0.00002378189,0.0000317935,0.00003711918,0.00008925012,0.00150187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5833011,0.0005720383,0.4136243,0.0001100282,0.00006724659,0.0001853656,0.0001659354,0.00002447165,0.001949564],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002498768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01321489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05990120423156841,"score_gpt":0.3221296329080834,"score_spread":0.262228428676515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}