{"id":"W2134226552","doi":"10.1002/etc.1971","title":"Derivation of screening benchmarks for dietary methylmercury exposure for the common loon (<i>Gavia immer</i>): Rationale for use in ecological risk assessment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Queen's University","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Methylmercury; Predation; Risk assessment; Biology; Reproduction; Apex predator; Fishery; Piscivore; Ecotoxicology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Toxicology; Ecology; Zoology; Predator; Bioaccumulation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00835293,0.001371306,0.0009477445,0.002758237,0.0007535635,0.002536782,0.003532234,0.001346498,0.0007901528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156223,0.0004522453,0.001115585,0.001880839,0.001490518,0.0008801591,0.002219201,0.001404452,0.0003265572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006417765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009373979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09160598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1506602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951352,0.00122362,0.0003920121,0.0005028631,0.002396289,0.0003499109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915252,0.002138328,0.001222085,0.0003065153,0.004543866,0.0002640151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002566171,0.001278822,0.2061378,0.006492745,0.0008781571,0.001015901,0.002631718,0.1122542,0.09300797,0.07211415,0.02178849,0.4798338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003852846,0.01288081,0.2827797,0.006536774,0.002414941,0.001339899,0.007200016,0.1715648,0.2490844,0.0624743,0.2024628,0.0008762582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4729054,0.03766336,0.3900694,0.01225538,0.0004658858,0.006944721,0.006619537,0.001665216,0.07141117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7211115,0.01007836,0.2585697,0.001994379,0.00004528628,0.001752905,0.002272675,0.0001202268,0.00405494],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09160598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1821455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02997526837149713,"score_gpt":0.2829678919690263,"score_spread":0.2529926235975292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}