{"id":"W2134226552","doi":"10.1002/etc.1971","title":"Derivation of screening benchmarks for dietary methylmercury exposure for the common loon (<i>Gavia immer</i>): Rationale for use in ecological risk assessment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Queen's University","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Methylmercury; Predation; Risk assessment; Biology; Reproduction; Apex predator; Fishery; Piscivore; Ecotoxicology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Toxicology; Ecology; Zoology; Predator; Bioaccumulation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000475745,0.0001335861,0.0001873221,0.000008552011,0.0002648858,0.000007808156,0.00008407162,0.0001381515,0.0004771528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007528012,0.0001051716,0.00007765986,0.00002936961,0.0002938101,0.0002041946,0.00009169684,0.000109102,6.080233e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008258751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004439298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009089184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001967222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991555,0.00004206064,0.0002659409,0.0001925352,0.00009322012,0.0002507337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998535,0.001127054,0.0001681354,0.0001107181,0.000002452256,0.00005660255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000140511,0.0003187129,0.7579507,0.00002909394,0.0000527455,1.069797e-7,0.0003398302,0.0002706905,0.2320458,0.00001495384,0.0007870612,0.008049869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001118554,0.0001860492,0.9323,0.000005568513,0.00008291005,0.000003017129,0.001148777,0.001014938,0.06121394,0.0003080672,0.002472729,0.000145445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933471,0.0003647091,0.004894594,0.0001943888,0.00006269804,0.0008322891,0.0001969635,0.000004147292,0.0001030967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991157,0.0001876989,0.007344773,0.0002135205,0.00005817339,0.0006323808,0.0002516008,0.000008321517,0.0001465353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1743493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5224488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02997526837149713,"score_gpt":0.2829678919690263,"score_spread":0.2529926235975292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}