{"id":"W2134407877","doi":"10.1109/isit.2010.5513247","title":"A Fokker-Planck differential equation approach for the zero-dispersion optical fiber channel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optical Network Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fokker–Planck equation; Probability density function; Physics; Langevin equation; Stochastic differential equation; Dispersion (optics); Nonlinear system; Statistical physics; Differential equation; Mathematical analysis; Nonlinear Schrödinger equation; Noise (video); Mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000799488,0.0001256639,0.0001105686,0.00003168754,0.0000781148,0.0000480204,0.0002105285,0.0001999922,0.0001188024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006825865,0.00007836577,0.00006469065,0.00008308037,0.00006885445,0.00006477148,0.0000571181,0.0002905415,0.00004243805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001298287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002804226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002014016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003175704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999337,0.000003165531,0.0001242304,0.0001468967,0.0001168837,0.000271803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994654,0.0002035992,0.000009709175,0.0002601965,0.00002274439,0.00003835546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001350851,0.00029631,0.0001334976,0.0002687602,0.0002939103,0.000001748541,0.0002058723,0.08163152,0.03598017,0.6533821,0.04169119,0.1859799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002521141,0.00003247608,0.000256126,0.000002940324,0.00002497543,0.0000024102,0.00003554875,0.9919786,0.003272694,0.002634033,0.001371359,0.0001367114],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08205002,0.00003471842,0.9007956,0.0003973561,0.0005983185,0.0005419764,0.000005225927,0.001020966,0.01455575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456834,0.000007756891,0.05361982,0.00001655552,0.0002338668,0.0001162592,0.00002351632,0.00002596981,0.0002728152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3195663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01751350468145721,"score_gpt":0.2110683555840377,"score_spread":0.1935548509025805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}