{"id":"W2134411641","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-13-93","title":"Understanding recruitment: outcomes associated with alternate methods for seed selection in respondent driven sampling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Agency of Canada; University of Manitoba; Manitoba Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Respondent; Population; Demography; Logistic regression; Homophily; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sampling (signal processing); Multinomial logistic regression; Medicine; Psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5501379,0.0008612219,0.001011353,0.001791758,0.002198093,0.006710264,0.003367598,0.003788806,0.003366443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7514048,0.0007312828,0.00203853,0.003084616,0.009714332,0.008989277,0.00684068,0.003879389,0.0006065299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006292379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005946842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002862089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002591127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2762717,0.663109,0.01811391,0.009598632,0.03044262,0.002464142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1164148,0.7897462,0.04792598,0.02465677,0.01992388,0.00133222],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004296375,0.001100077,0.5109087,0.004574879,0.001203995,0.0003238182,0.1013812,0.005706877,0.001366033,0.1032069,0.004506169,0.261425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001179955,0.01165256,0.5625814,0.009022051,0.001543832,0.001401208,0.04620798,0.09649904,0.008693567,0.2083663,0.05225014,0.0006019845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.461621,0.004126369,0.4802798,0.01957516,0.000714549,0.009996843,0.0006028496,0.0002610305,0.02282236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8629808,0.0006591946,0.1219277,0.003368971,0.0002809183,0.009459567,0.0002617196,0.00008591605,0.0009751226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4498621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5547601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.876707078736003,"score_gpt":0.6524279278495625,"score_spread":0.2242791508864405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}