{"id":"W2134411641","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-13-93","title":"Understanding recruitment: outcomes associated with alternate methods for seed selection in respondent driven sampling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Agency of Canada; University of Manitoba; Manitoba Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Respondent; Population; Demography; Logistic regression; Homophily; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sampling (signal processing); Multinomial logistic regression; Medicine; Psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05045347,0.0002827857,0.001149634,0.001201793,0.0002293763,0.00004964977,0.0004028094,0.0005977575,0.0006351834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2030975,0.000206138,0.000135749,0.001254896,0.0004966932,0.000135994,0.0002184946,0.00170695,0.00004401045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001761876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001527958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009356971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003442525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9763818,0.01885009,0.0008114088,0.0008112961,0.001696453,0.001448918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8858881,0.1119742,0.0002007956,0.0003847412,0.0006372011,0.0009149569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008393723,0.001389591,0.7575439,0.0009037592,0.001425684,0.0001781024,0.0117466,0.0003142572,0.07244675,0.01371263,0.00150897,0.1304361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03772184,0.01073715,0.6073838,0.003123097,0.0004091246,0.0003625589,0.05275507,0.1598924,0.008616498,0.1143069,0.003262861,0.001428659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2358732,0.00008590001,0.7567974,0.003107069,0.0001809419,0.003189163,0.000003927638,0.0001025648,0.0006597365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1800853,0.0001534873,0.8139155,0.0005615192,0.0002167319,0.002046323,0.00004989284,0.0001102577,0.002861008],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1595782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.977758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.876707078736003,"score_gpt":0.6524279278495625,"score_spread":0.2242791508864405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}