{"id":"W2134544740","doi":"10.1139/f2012-115","title":"Modelling available habitat versus available energy flux: do PHABSIM applications that neglect prey abundance underestimate optimal flows for juvenile salmonids?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Habitat; Environmental science; Oncorhynchus; Abundance (ecology); Foraging; Ecology; Juvenile; Flux (metallurgy); Bioenergetics; Optimal foraging theory; Biology; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003265035,0.0004838126,0.00065401,0.0006589269,0.0002704596,0.001077653,0.0008183994,0.0006726573,0.0004817071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01344847,0.0005113693,0.0003458871,0.0007435377,0.0004205708,0.001709205,0.0007239894,0.0003847672,0.0001172734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001097224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000958284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02466075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03109645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999281,0.000385829,0.00005341893,0.0001403712,0.00009454867,0.00004491201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996234,0.002405574,0.0006334293,0.0002714565,0.0003337024,0.000121745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002370466,0.00005387633,0.469473,0.0002522525,0.0002392714,0.00008526265,0.0002457353,0.4841969,0.002635793,0.002280091,0.0005038177,0.03979698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002820608,0.00009576017,0.0870563,0.00006839365,0.00004329127,0.00008684308,0.0001466094,0.9073122,0.001439143,0.002938121,0.00075276,0.00003236145],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9376647,0.0005277923,0.05890076,0.0003871171,0.0000233045,0.00003866295,0.0004999654,0.0001885928,0.001769257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807823,0.000196441,0.01839663,0.00007527207,0.00000881284,0.00004591151,0.0001860899,0.00003278854,0.0002757779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02466075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04903448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0388373557551853,"score_gpt":0.2315735425315121,"score_spread":0.1927361867763268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}