{"id":"W2134575841","doi":"10.1017/s1744552306002011","title":"The socio-legal context of privacy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Dialectic; Context (archaeology); Rhetoric; Individualism; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Political science; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Privacy laws of the United States; Sociology; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Epistemology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001447202,0.00007262135,0.0001535658,0.00007605003,0.0001962443,0.0001427737,0.001141557,0.00007025545,0.00006296372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007674392,0.00005570595,0.0001270068,0.00007979897,0.0004166187,0.0005954645,0.0001168044,0.000245178,0.000009813367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002215735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002276603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01839931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02240079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982176,0.0002083872,0.0005904413,0.0000837527,0.0007405291,0.0001592931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982216,0.0004337759,0.0005109611,0.0001197367,0.0006723152,0.00004166291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002248893,0.0001609632,0.004071647,0.000003089652,0.00006326952,0.00003755153,0.00432133,0.00000578512,0.0004080609,0.9534337,0.004852773,0.03241693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001202708,0.00007303103,0.003158688,0.00008170494,0.000009298975,0.00002664317,0.004593321,0.00002388432,0.00135051,0.08570972,0.903675,0.00009553845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8440988,0.003847657,0.001481207,0.06019194,0.007056344,0.0004292104,0.00006534866,0.00002796906,0.08280149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981353,0.0002485185,0.0001032333,0.0003499988,0.0009085499,0.000002669998,0.000002399521,0.000005403733,0.0002438924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8988222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0273325988158928,"score_gpt":0.3281923061950091,"score_spread":0.3008597073791163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}