{"id":"W2134634811","doi":"10.1017/s0142716412000446","title":"Comparing the effect of skewed and balanced input on English as a foreign language learners’ comprehension of the double-object dative construction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Psycholinguistics","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Foreign language; Psychology; Computer science; Dative case; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107418,0.0005949637,0.0009511259,0.000449772,0.0002953362,0.0006586748,0.0004506797,0.0004562183,0.004357541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009092428,0.0003239781,0.0002688335,0.0002662414,0.0004295662,0.000605987,0.0009587375,0.0006925668,0.0004825843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002244031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005688954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007116511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00103296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989514,0.0004055429,0.0001017182,0.0001614603,0.0002557871,0.0001240614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929975,0.004836952,0.000666808,0.0002220742,0.0004598148,0.0008168301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.047278,0.04996456,0.0480612,0.002859345,0.0003402095,0.002196826,0.02518968,0.001567778,0.5748312,0.0004824677,0.0009984525,0.2462302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005449773,0.2182092,0.4911359,0.0007238653,0.001017337,0.001793276,0.0180744,0.006868838,0.2477638,0.001674991,0.007063162,0.0002256022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994045,0.0000248853,0.0001683621,0.000008198416,0.000002694205,0.00003944814,0.00001853737,0.000010129,0.0003230501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963546,0.0001073516,0.00252674,0.00002530778,0.000005337214,0.000236533,0.0000771702,0.00001344787,0.0006535383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004357541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01457745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01794414096672858,"score_gpt":0.3090378173542911,"score_spread":0.2910936763875625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}