{"id":"W2134695142","doi":"10.1002/per.705","title":"How to find what's in a name: Scrutinizing the optimality of five scoring algorithms for the name‐letter task","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Personality","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Outlier; Task (project management); Psychology; Variance (accounting); Algorithm; Measure (data warehouse); Psychometrics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Data mining; Clinical psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07695043,0.000643375,0.0009473698,0.001802075,0.0006392861,0.00373388,0.001132036,0.001338145,0.00137085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3596576,0.0004583122,0.000608891,0.0009621259,0.002157337,0.003331868,0.00212681,0.00131435,0.0007514213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007330568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001277343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001136845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001155275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9588312,0.02653578,0.00405088,0.003059486,0.006954452,0.0005682482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6196405,0.311181,0.0244829,0.01914534,0.02376959,0.00178059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00553758,0.001012002,0.480345,0.0006524089,0.0007103524,0.0002433698,0.01648674,0.01044317,0.01511751,0.009817518,0.002822095,0.4568124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001094926,0.005311876,0.698662,0.0004719552,0.0004498152,0.001514422,0.00694292,0.2223153,0.0281854,0.0272719,0.007215201,0.0005642673],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542129,0.0001590437,0.04056755,0.0002233122,0.00005924095,0.0003323889,0.0001013103,0.0001795615,0.004164653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561716,0.0001109825,0.04212339,0.0001409213,0.00003224533,0.000356345,0.000212521,0.0001326023,0.0007193866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07695043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4069576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07058332216480193,"score_gpt":0.3486783592673305,"score_spread":0.2780950371025286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}