{"id":"W2134706900","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.007","title":"Viability of mountain caribou in British Columbia, Canada: Effects of habitat change and population density","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Vital rates; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Endangered species; Population; Ecology; Habitat; Population decline; Population density; Density dependence; Population size; Population viability analysis; Population growth; Population model; Geography; Mark and recapture; Population projection; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002581417,0.00004552849,0.0001554195,0.000008296893,0.00004311004,0.000005942292,0.00004712702,0.0001088383,0.00002897531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003966762,0.00005990606,0.00001375169,0.0001390495,0.0001055386,0.0001020132,0.00002746878,0.000053918,3.028408e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001258265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001936229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9421085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992864,0.0001392911,0.0002216528,0.000169276,0.00008417539,0.00009922578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995988,0.0001754911,0.0001097299,0.00007344216,0.00001703586,0.00002549785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001171262,0.00004783235,0.9948424,0.00001198494,0.000001211836,0.000002252991,0.00001903112,0.000002035616,0.001146893,0.00002845189,0.00009901458,0.003787194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002033116,0.0001436593,0.997457,0.0000141337,0.000003620993,0.000001632442,0.00001128664,0.0001980967,0.0001039422,0.001789015,0.00001513467,0.00005911389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990121,0.00002614915,0.00001501434,0.0005310568,0.0000354531,0.000349679,0.000006903324,0.000007239701,0.00001638905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987246,0.000009036581,0.0001436005,0.001057184,0.000006469342,0.0000126511,0.00003974985,0.000001136004,0.000005577239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05056655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2442898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01574643874963968,"score_gpt":0.1988971412938415,"score_spread":0.1831507025442018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}