{"id":"W2134786914","doi":"10.1002/jcc.21694","title":"Three‐dimensional visualization of the first hyperpolarizability tensor","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","topic":"Nonlinear Optical Materials Research","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Compute Canada; Ontario Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Hyperpolarizability; Second-harmonic generation; Anisotropy; Visualization; Tensor (intrinsic definition); Polarization (electrochemistry); Molecule; Representation (politics); Materials science; Physics; Chemistry; Optics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Polarizability; Physical chemistry; Geometry; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006713325,0.0000784294,0.0001708632,0.00001970787,0.00008872084,0.00003561312,0.0003559404,0.00007720576,0.00106847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005779743,0.00005134101,0.00009484971,0.000118072,0.0002566847,0.0001046174,0.0001068543,0.0002137731,0.00001225973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002684517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002809294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005675157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003148541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985061,0.00002495076,0.000489564,0.0001019615,0.0007603907,0.0001169895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982563,0.0002848728,0.0003530675,0.0001493031,0.0008853382,0.00007113419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006431748,0.0001291761,0.004759019,0.00006287888,0.000006998333,0.00000172518,0.00001184652,0.00568868,0.9889155,0.0001818676,0.0001411239,0.00003686358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003738419,0.00002937732,0.05543991,0.0000384223,0.00001203197,0.0001434994,0.000003783205,0.002417019,0.9287263,0.01236319,0.0003800175,0.00007267335],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980609,0.00001212405,0.0006419476,0.0007175769,0.0003566167,0.00005484875,0.00002205406,0.000005712459,0.0001282389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911221,2.475636e-7,0.008497921,0.00004800906,0.0003046739,8.038019e-7,0.000003047927,0.000008483493,0.00001467376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06018927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01348858858994639,"score_gpt":0.2911174262974346,"score_spread":0.2776288377074882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}