{"id":"W2134831983","doi":"10.1109/glocom.1993.318191","title":"Performance evaluation of partial erasure decoding for non-binary block codes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Coding theory and cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada); University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Decoding methods; Erasure; Erasure code; List decoding; Computer science; Algorithm; Binary number; Code (set theory); Upper and lower bounds; Sequential decoding; Binary code; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Block code; Concatenated error correction code","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001820913,0.00056769,0.0006348006,0.000665232,0.0003838982,0.0007596781,0.0005389706,0.000646694,0.002138765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01134899,0.0001648498,0.0002387544,0.0008058555,0.0005528171,0.001044127,0.0007703016,0.0003077613,0.0004184812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000905428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008688995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001877156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001717439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976879,0.00085544,0.00008304397,0.0001134213,0.001055495,0.0002046587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912582,0.005500244,0.0004103178,0.0007471153,0.001943585,0.0001404646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002161419,0.00007181677,0.006063712,0.0003717085,0.0001526769,0.0001734215,0.0001603507,0.7690149,0.04156161,0.02480187,0.001527857,0.1539387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001765128,0.0005460728,0.001536627,0.00001821332,0.00002314319,0.0002202077,0.00002470073,0.9605826,0.03273059,0.003281919,0.0009920357,0.00002635655],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6573089,0.003151033,0.318089,0.0003979277,0.00008791822,0.0001082069,0.0004854601,0.002309024,0.01806249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624758,0.0004594491,0.03518275,0.00003602612,0.0000187101,0.00003653549,0.0003502761,0.00007709416,0.001363304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002138765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009629965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05298843826562864,"score_gpt":0.2768273245894315,"score_spread":0.2238388863238028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}