{"id":"W2134861067","doi":"10.1136/bmj.38356.424606.8f","title":"Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":623,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Odds ratio; Confidence interval; Clinical trial; Odds; MEDLINE; Statistical significance; Publication bias; Number needed to harm; Meta-analysis; Cohort; Randomized controlled trial; Family medicine; Relative risk; Number needed to treat; Internal medicine; Logistic regression","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7683607,0.0001376276,0.006114576,0.0005655572,0.00003354544,0.0001671028,0.0005835546,0.00005258483,0.001518689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8577444,0.00006606165,0.001125323,0.00191402,0.00003320753,0.0001821117,0.00006667998,0.00008898803,0.00006014299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001698585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006432395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000734251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001949624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7769894,0.08136646,0.1309914,0.00157616,0.008591454,0.0004851266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7760713,0.06538488,0.147347,0.007239591,0.00363979,0.0003173661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000528118,0.00008639422,0.8059219,0.001583454,0.0001830854,0.000001196443,0.000221728,0.00002580398,0.00003070306,0.0007117701,0.07560535,0.1155758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001437517,0.000007745776,0.9840948,0.001203605,0.000198103,0.000005227788,0.00007176653,0.0003496434,0.00004541136,0.0003136988,0.01216646,0.0001060153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8775975,0.04898069,0.00551469,0.02078524,0.0007295203,0.01580116,0.00007922443,0.00001406664,0.03049799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886984,0.0009466853,0.003816215,0.0003198986,0.00005502637,0.0002882138,0.00001137807,0.000008436651,0.005855748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1781729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.964751385927545,"score_gpt":0.6634631956852197,"score_spread":0.3012881902423252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}