{"id":"W2134861067","doi":"10.1136/bmj.38356.424606.8f","title":"Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":623,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Odds ratio; Confidence interval; Clinical trial; Odds; MEDLINE; Statistical significance; Publication bias; Number needed to harm; Meta-analysis; Cohort; Randomized controlled trial; Family medicine; Relative risk; Number needed to treat; Internal medicine; Logistic regression","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.674016,0.003011726,0.01343442,0.05808099,0.002645818,0.009974747,0.004690345,0.006031246,0.004684525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8685284,0.003869889,0.01225824,0.05008982,0.006492208,0.01515005,0.009236782,0.002848009,0.001883814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00699244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02726433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001780843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002554964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1386698,0.3738233,0.4125455,0.01323125,0.05986654,0.001863622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03508326,0.5925585,0.2831395,0.0319499,0.05623495,0.001033919],"domain_codex":"reporting","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":"reporting","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002429901,0.000110739,0.1011184,0.6996784,0.02536579,0.0005923827,0.01006051,0.0005263531,0.001221587,0.002954737,0.01465143,0.1412898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002494558,0.001555212,0.1170132,0.7139813,0.06418944,0.003719771,0.006262436,0.002037436,0.003562843,0.01202523,0.07248763,0.0006709207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07602226,0.7234803,0.08096534,0.01735977,0.003878624,0.06711818,0.02402339,0.0008344945,0.006317556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3354353,0.2675442,0.1384869,0.01326,0.003128081,0.223935,0.01569268,0.0007530695,0.00176494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4019964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.964751385927545,"score_gpt":0.6634631956852197,"score_spread":0.3012881902423252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}