{"id":"W2134865850","doi":"10.1109/iscas.2009.5118030","title":"A spectral matching method for pitch estimation from noise-corrupted speech","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Speech and Audio Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Discrete cosine transform; Speech recognition; Noise (video); Computer science; Pitch detection algorithm; Matching (statistics); Harmonic; Frame (networking); Frequency domain; Spectral density estimation; Speech enhancement; Spectral density; Speech processing; Noise reduction; Pattern recognition (psychology); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Acoustics; Computer vision; Fourier transform; Image (mathematics); Telecommunications; Statistics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007283019,0.0004775592,0.0005942075,0.0009492605,0.0003592378,0.000567867,0.0006672534,0.0006059256,0.002576424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002359378,0.0002617727,0.0004196529,0.0007583228,0.0003631978,0.0008743956,0.0006848978,0.0005599665,0.001593614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001814991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004056202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005060416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006338475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993439,0.0001133474,0.00004390611,0.0001234252,0.0003504788,0.00002479816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993708,0.0002167649,0.00007065032,0.0001108238,0.0002010662,0.0000299724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002953046,0.00006374654,0.0003875699,0.0001959818,0.00005484672,0.0001780537,0.0001013424,0.02006539,0.2092399,0.009394987,0.001370389,0.7586525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005528587,0.0002737939,0.001610872,0.00003622376,0.00007790507,0.001048463,0.00005592811,0.7816302,0.1927867,0.00619131,0.01616523,0.00006805351],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00347612,0.0001108166,0.9956797,0.00001891591,0.00003525339,0.00002178873,0.00002087691,0.0002327095,0.0004037869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06807385,0.0003063015,0.9289823,0.0000454218,0.0001024713,0.00007139871,0.0001492691,0.00009007473,0.002178955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002576424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008618951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01715889976179657,"score_gpt":0.3037245129576917,"score_spread":0.2865656131958951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}