{"id":"W2135323132","doi":"10.1109/jlt.2004.827674","title":"Comparative Evaluation of a Novel Series Approximation for Electromagnetic Fields at Dielectric Corners With Boundary Element Method Applications","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Lightwave Technology","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary element method; Solver; Series (stratigraphy); Electromagnetic field; Dielectric; Boundary value problem; Mathematical analysis; Computational electromagnetics; Boundary (topology); Finite element method; Mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Mathematical optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005627555,0.0001366667,0.0003653295,0.0004195555,0.00006859513,0.000009053475,0.0001372324,0.0001352196,0.00002106123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006597563,0.0001132556,0.00006559431,0.0007261856,0.00007533881,0.00008629476,0.00001164206,0.0001986999,6.246737e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002907579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001231551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.185768e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001055552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988553,0.00004230633,0.0005038508,0.0001181894,0.0002846895,0.0001956594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987984,0.0001414542,0.0003184241,0.0001492841,0.000552465,0.0000400117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004425167,0.0004025329,0.00006399837,0.0001435209,0.0004459734,0.000001248861,0.0006541694,0.1384284,0.7887106,0.02465112,0.0001469185,0.04590901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005416041,0.007477359,0.0004422963,0.00006071319,0.0005067397,0.0003651636,0.0001998202,0.1174608,0.8239546,0.04116655,0.002647529,0.0003023996],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1678055,0.0009118823,0.8295512,0.0005366661,0.00004070964,0.0006343923,0.000002596892,0.00005493552,0.0004621142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5949292,0.00003257968,0.4048517,0.00001409427,0.00002578295,0.00011585,0.000003642464,0.00001172808,0.00001541511],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4271237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.461843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02860160436091616,"score_gpt":0.326931620293813,"score_spread":0.2983300159328968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}