{"id":"W2135400982","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015","title":"GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Confidence interval; Quality of evidence; Publication bias; Medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Evidence-based medicine; Quality Score; Alternative medicine; Operations management; Internal medicine; Pathology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null}