{"id":"W2135468165","doi":"10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00445.x","title":"The evolution of infertility: does hatching rate in birds coevolve with female polyandry?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Hatching; Inbreeding depression; Inbreeding; Natural selection; Zoology; Reproductive success; Evolutionary biology; Infertility; Sexual selection; Range (aeronautics); Sperm; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Demography; Genetics; Population; Pregnancy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001083811,0.0002117783,0.000349417,0.0009307221,0.000423411,0.0007966404,0.0005146585,0.0005728405,0.001496925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003386087,0.0002341834,0.0002483113,0.0005527294,0.001012683,0.0004323194,0.0005070065,0.0005415835,0.0001949428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001754803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001302546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00141593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002710634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995847,0.000185634,0.00002588139,0.00009327518,0.00005383942,0.00005660524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959675,0.001723795,0.001253392,0.0003873909,0.0002470882,0.0004207668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001404346,0.0000415322,0.986905,0.00001231668,0.0000920624,0.0001284199,0.0002067897,0.0002020164,0.008696449,0.0001355495,0.00004946598,0.003390013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001682056,0.00003227636,0.9992618,0.000001635207,0.00001184979,0.00009059875,0.00006341767,0.0003155197,0.0001324472,0.00005260433,0.00003292033,0.000003339536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994565,0.0001099653,0.000123379,0.00003968827,0.000001679208,0.000001230374,0.00001944934,0.000002301483,0.0002458417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997745,0.00002941832,0.00007124523,0.00001483168,0.000004509575,0.000001262345,0.00002333299,0.000003391278,0.00007751767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001496925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005731761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01812327802207553,"score_gpt":0.2281745315564289,"score_spread":0.2100512535343534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}