{"id":"W2135531855","doi":"10.1108/14757701211228200","title":"More power to you: properties of a more powerful event study methodology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Accounting and Finance","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Null hypothesis; Null (SQL); Estimator; Econometrics; Event study; Event (particle physics); Statistical hypothesis testing; Sample (material); Alternative hypothesis; Sample size determination; Originality; Statistical power; Computer science; Power (physics); Statistics; Data mining; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912404,0.0001717063,0.0008570497,0.0001123224,0.00004824372,0.000011946,0.0001844396,0.00005433116,0.00003919216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000557007,0.0001504856,0.0001028744,0.0002822861,0.00009662061,0.0002753365,0.0001075465,0.0000929406,0.00002109187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001795321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001944425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001539738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001396029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984831,0.00003605338,0.0008696443,0.0002671839,0.00005845498,0.0002856225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989226,0.00003417366,0.0006141883,0.0003186977,0.00007785322,0.00003249323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001695699,0.002710589,0.5745509,0.01907061,0.000271257,0.000003989915,0.01617078,0.00002583467,0.0005125718,0.3600501,0.005530409,0.0209333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007196323,0.0009921658,0.7847899,0.008423582,0.0000762333,0.00001284241,0.001932159,0.00004467295,0.0005847875,0.001904488,0.1997063,0.0008132716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7464055,0.2502407,0.00009162722,0.0006252558,0.0002125134,0.0004826005,0.00002096403,0.00000803647,0.001912734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672445,0.03014901,0.001640551,0.0006987244,0.0000465133,0.00003416168,0.000001235746,0.0000157068,0.0001695853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3581457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6136624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07254051274649206,"score_gpt":0.2964975405516411,"score_spread":0.223957027805149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}