{"id":"W2135657463","doi":"10.1504/ijhvs.2010.035994","title":"Analysis of transient fluid slosh in partly-filled tanks with and without baffles: Part 1 – model validation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems","topic":"Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministère des Transports; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Slosh dynamics; Volume of fluid method; Acceleration; Engineering; Baffle; Transient (computer programming); Mechanics; Computational fluid dynamics; Fluent; Range (aeronautics); Structural engineering; Flow (mathematics); Physics; Aerospace engineering; Mechanical engineering; Computer science; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003287246,0.0004651215,0.0005862869,0.0003365874,0.0004366712,0.00052943,0.0006563347,0.0008583144,0.001693497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008856615,0.0002254974,0.0005676905,0.0002701897,0.0005914507,0.0004647377,0.0004389591,0.0004234223,0.0002320123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005759257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01082468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00535624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998487,0.00002320083,0.00001111025,0.00002530838,0.00006024366,0.00003144447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995508,0.0002301207,0.0000459296,0.0000589429,0.00008716606,0.00002711013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002706717,0.0001145492,0.004427177,0.0001489723,0.0000193428,0.0001662938,0.0001468828,0.9339368,0.05224163,0.0005593651,0.0003038986,0.007664429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000225661,0.0001425608,0.002109848,0.000007014572,0.000005182407,0.00001611933,0.00005265733,0.9768561,0.02033936,0.000117383,0.0003161206,0.00001508209],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585231,0.00006013324,0.03813292,0.00005481295,0.00001823566,0.00009299479,0.0006623174,0.0004590164,0.001996424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951066,0.00003356974,0.003477411,0.000006412717,0.000001517638,0.00009463098,0.0002440683,0.00001981849,0.00101597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01082468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02152336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01294692469974199,"score_gpt":0.2611686909986071,"score_spread":0.2482217662988651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}