{"id":"W2135716133","doi":"10.1139/l99-029","title":"Seismic evaluation and retrofit with steel jackets of reinforced concrete bridge piers detailed with lap-splices","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete","field":"Engineering","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pier; Structural engineering; Reinforced concrete; Seismic retrofit; Plastic hinge; Bridge (graph theory); Seismic analysis; Reinforcement; Engineering; Seismic loading; Ductility (Earth science); Geotechnical engineering; Materials science; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003144889,0.0005025927,0.0002318265,0.0005499468,0.0002563667,0.0002082803,0.0005880368,0.0003054133,0.0006518507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005855366,0.0002796633,0.0002624039,0.000404366,0.0003963594,0.0002031281,0.000318725,0.0002344443,0.0001521016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004782068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002951797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01262168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04020964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997402,0.00002406273,0.000009706104,0.00003371634,0.0001518415,0.000040518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996845,0.00005229134,0.00007874641,0.00003979106,0.00009076786,0.00005395845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009654477,0.0005841397,0.2534873,0.00009904028,0.00008028914,0.002735906,0.001455549,0.05705907,0.6613798,0.0001626186,0.0001411442,0.0218497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003565364,0.005762477,0.723833,0.00001405109,0.0000768262,0.001016733,0.001527107,0.08047554,0.1864726,0.00004761875,0.0007033412,0.00003505365],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995857,0.000004779551,0.0002704996,0.000001035333,4.515701e-7,0.0000034956,0.00001386552,0.000005812002,0.0001143417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992166,0.00001441276,0.00041967,0.000001216613,6.270881e-7,0.000002459309,0.00006523875,0.000002896218,0.000276897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01262168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02509642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008367705504574493,"score_gpt":0.1923779447090702,"score_spread":0.1840102392044957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}