{"id":"W2135716133","doi":"10.1139/l99-029","title":"Seismic evaluation and retrofit with steel jackets of reinforced concrete bridge piers detailed with lap-splices","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete","field":"Engineering","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pier; Structural engineering; Reinforced concrete; Seismic retrofit; Plastic hinge; Bridge (graph theory); Seismic analysis; Reinforcement; Engineering; Seismic loading; Ductility (Earth science); Geotechnical engineering; Materials science; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002187666,0.0002473984,0.0003747966,0.0003322944,0.00004297728,0.00005340842,0.0001811635,0.00009256549,0.0002970078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003034845,0.0002163058,0.00005429993,0.0002646077,0.00007161082,0.000417639,0.000003611048,0.0003032389,0.000001751329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002087116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003079367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003685451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002209266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987599,0.00001226016,0.000399389,0.000116284,0.0003430894,0.0003691187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989432,0.000041547,0.0001224439,0.0001892243,0.0002099527,0.0004936198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000548698,3.191157e-8,0.002052991,0.0001088165,0.0001773961,0.00007023463,0.0005104595,0.9838911,0.01014726,0.00003694962,0.00007936352,0.002870539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004515074,0.0008037346,0.1029217,0.001321948,0.0006079274,0.001990424,0.000199492,0.8657532,0.01868944,0.000005043925,0.002146726,0.001045243],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967869,0.0008622626,0.0009758843,0.00001945985,0.0001074217,0.0001943929,0.00001226441,0.00003512327,0.001006318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991407,0.00004983382,0.0006147862,0.00001590298,0.00005677433,0.000004730173,0.00000495132,0.00005405972,0.0000583048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1181378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8820695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008367705504574493,"score_gpt":0.1923779447090702,"score_spread":0.1840102392044957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}