{"id":"W2135718473","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3575","title":"The Analysis of three Case Studies as a guide to the Development of Pedagogy in Engineering Design Education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering design process; Design education; Documentation; Engineering ethics; Product design; Industrial design; Design brief; Engineering; Multidisciplinary approach; Process (computing); Engineering education; New product development; Engineering management; Design review (U.S. government); Product (mathematics); Computer science; Sociology; Management; Operations management; Business; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02766339,0.001373171,0.001019542,0.008533741,0.007535325,0.006312476,0.002700406,0.003277671,0.005137032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04423974,0.0008103946,0.001261036,0.008124213,0.005354558,0.00528885,0.005496464,0.003448148,0.001112008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008451899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01076747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005697335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0117072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9559238,0.03414706,0.002345611,0.0009230394,0.005642984,0.001017468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415595,0.04577885,0.002004701,0.002397952,0.007190602,0.001068443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002081062,0.001674361,0.007658897,0.003642635,0.00006344761,0.01100209,0.2469036,0.004687847,0.006554834,0.3184555,0.02488415,0.3742646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008503663,0.0005005532,0.00476915,0.006355086,0.0000663352,0.005454779,0.2156356,0.003734221,0.007216133,0.05136516,0.7046614,0.0001566816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1757061,0.01095443,0.5029208,0.01641849,0.0008302297,0.03039125,0.001083163,0.0003883441,0.2613072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2705015,0.008784197,0.6723425,0.001532679,0.00005702984,0.01697885,0.0007459944,0.0001481941,0.02890912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02766339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1462998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01900948250397675,"score_gpt":0.2707043488287386,"score_spread":0.2516948663247618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}