{"id":"W2135742393","doi":"10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014","title":"Socio-hydrology and the science–policy interface: a case study of the Saskatchewan River basin","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrology and earth system sciences","topic":"Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan; Arizona State University; University of Saskatchewan; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Water security; Water resources; Context (archaeology); Urbanization; Geography; Water trading; Population; Climate change; Flood myth; Water cycle; Population growth; Corporate governance; Water resource management; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Business; Ecology; Water conservation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002857729,0.0001676542,0.0003302283,0.0000853311,0.002029445,0.00003904042,0.0005662025,0.00006735355,0.00001579242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008519045,0.00008105255,0.00003693912,0.0005869356,0.01773948,0.000187957,0.0009890287,0.0001220802,0.00001035395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002362153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004565081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01624644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008983509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976565,0.0007280434,0.0002852066,0.0005344104,0.0003593137,0.0004365328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991094,0.000293044,0.000179607,0.0003269705,0.0000139083,0.00007702924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003674608,0.0006006039,0.5914314,0.0001260169,0.0002419726,0.0001797377,0.303095,0.01187565,0.005293386,0.07487687,0.0003228256,0.01158903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01296332,0.008721818,0.2803107,0.0001466466,0.0004893547,0.01779633,0.439699,0.1784281,0.005108143,0.0528955,0.001828215,0.00161289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884253,0.00008668121,0.00002457403,0.00162665,0.0002074741,0.0002844121,0.000002240427,0.00001888813,0.009323746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994748,0.000002275601,0.00003358363,0.0002743822,0.00004057676,0.00002146729,3.111409e-8,0.000004034087,0.0001488124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3111207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01020712831495267,"score_gpt":0.2276275881652865,"score_spread":0.2174204598503339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}