{"id":"W2135877839","doi":"10.5194/bg-5-451-2008","title":"Quality control of CarboEurope flux data – Part 2: Inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biogeosciences","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Eddy covariance; Software; Flux (metallurgy); Covariance; Range (aeronautics); Quality assurance; Computer science; Instrumentation (computer programming); Data processing; Data mining; Quality (philosophy); Environmental science; Remote sensing; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics; Engineering; Geology; Chemistry; Aerospace engineering; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03013481,0.0008550737,0.0007050836,0.002556399,0.001069308,0.002329041,0.001333965,0.0006692258,0.001768423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06921377,0.0004405372,0.0008529563,0.002859044,0.0008687046,0.001306523,0.001412455,0.0005528961,0.000689538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001038769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001243855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007014366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006561396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823154,0.005394278,0.002665255,0.002340237,0.006841821,0.0004429911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9361981,0.01840203,0.004409336,0.01244181,0.02807806,0.0004706392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004822938,0.0006637112,0.2176268,0.001710833,0.001657688,0.0003044979,0.003159175,0.01698605,0.1737454,0.004238824,0.01410422,0.5609798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003464406,0.0005781463,0.7198495,0.0002223882,0.000366679,0.0003644665,0.0005564448,0.04073419,0.2059805,0.001957772,0.02885579,0.0001877521],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5643923,0.001350543,0.4060375,0.0003013638,0.0004578991,0.002114794,0.009669901,0.007400049,0.008275705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7610773,0.0002717499,0.2153757,0.0001581777,0.00006048896,0.001654087,0.01571965,0.0033133,0.002369541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03013481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04581742636974615,"score_gpt":0.2805262925826068,"score_spread":0.2347088662128606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}