{"id":"W2135937426","doi":"10.1109/is.2008.4670508","title":"A Bayesian approach for software quality prediction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software quality; Gibbs sampling; Data mining; Bayesian probability; Software; Software metric; Machine learning; Dirichlet distribution; Software development; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004212768,0.0009903498,0.001656915,0.003283236,0.0007914621,0.00175991,0.002978764,0.002040543,0.002515354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01726742,0.001074323,0.00135571,0.002444585,0.001607484,0.003232435,0.001908333,0.002316203,0.0009221915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001596702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00152954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007487381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006257532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964121,0.001371608,0.0001556251,0.0006767664,0.001204348,0.0001796415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931914,0.005046134,0.000361949,0.0004504309,0.0007981311,0.0001520008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001333617,0.000141632,0.002614448,0.0001456907,0.0002006931,0.000122407,0.0002079699,0.5825032,0.002122005,0.1492212,0.00367178,0.2589157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001376902,0.00002005935,0.0003386854,0.00001753315,0.00001986954,0.00005317842,0.000008548441,0.9105166,0.0003511266,0.08713836,0.001496598,0.0000257448],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001636833,0.000225937,0.9972609,0.0001278285,0.00001523087,0.00001436586,0.00004023948,0.0001571667,0.0005214726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2384987,0.001357322,0.7542996,0.0003050303,0.0003268759,0.0003581115,0.0005868876,0.0001889741,0.004078364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007487381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0222795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05145918430503104,"score_gpt":0.2931873281437155,"score_spread":0.2417281438386845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}