{"id":"W2135942198","doi":"10.1080/10298436.2011.573557","title":"Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Pavement Engineering","topic":"Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Federal Highway Administration","keywords":"Rut; Asphalt; Creep; Viscoelasticity; Rheology; Asphalt pavement; Materials science; Geotechnical engineering; Engineering; Structural engineering; Forensic engineering; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000434941,0.0003258885,0.0003759022,0.001838371,0.0002605802,0.0003409183,0.0004761463,0.0003188626,0.002812508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001529291,0.0001562372,0.0002586135,0.001170894,0.0001900478,0.0004912768,0.0001958722,0.0005727545,0.001104108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002484937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000191453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00114369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001832706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992883,0.00004529844,0.00004927408,0.0001092026,0.0004567478,0.00005126206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987547,0.0002133336,0.0002221515,0.0001218285,0.0006424241,0.00004543143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000204414,0.0001053036,0.01000566,0.0001490894,0.00002320609,0.0003182045,0.0002738943,0.00149364,0.9486231,0.0003178518,0.0004526844,0.03803296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001248664,0.0007199031,0.1101249,0.00003090337,0.00007067365,0.0006215773,0.0003536275,0.0226267,0.8576603,0.0002091616,0.007512438,0.0000574645],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253301,0.001591509,0.05722607,0.0001034721,0.00009317677,0.0002878099,0.001610207,0.001119059,0.01263857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985437,0.0003673138,0.008669711,0.00004443029,0.00001874214,0.00007302097,0.0006058376,0.00008760577,0.004696291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002812508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009408772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03615124943778165,"score_gpt":0.2591206534561166,"score_spread":0.2229694040183349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}