{"id":"W2135942198","doi":"10.1080/10298436.2011.573557","title":"Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Pavement Engineering","topic":"Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Federal Highway Administration","keywords":"Rut; Asphalt; Creep; Viscoelasticity; Rheology; Asphalt pavement; Materials science; Geotechnical engineering; Engineering; Structural engineering; Forensic engineering; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003930589,0.0001470818,0.0002787651,0.0007798572,0.00001062337,0.00001636547,0.0003880665,0.00005827108,0.0004934951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001041168,0.0001389375,0.0002149514,0.0002976928,0.00001663774,0.0003484331,0.0000415708,0.0001615764,0.000006262143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001643512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001491495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005991696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000619458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984437,0.00001054735,0.0007549861,0.00008994171,0.0005427907,0.0001580182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991832,0.00008296231,0.0002450304,0.0001167882,0.0003066379,0.00006537362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001507374,0.0001916519,0.06638455,0.0000323495,0.002909892,0.00002851457,0.0004611369,0.8959545,0.03192937,0.0001347653,0.00004011909,0.001918022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006967155,0.0001697025,0.1537179,0.0001408277,0.0004182961,0.000008370149,0.00009575474,0.7792878,0.06511513,0.00001612312,0.0001441889,0.0001891946],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7220041,0.0002833116,0.2759688,0.00001230379,0.001256789,0.00007859142,0.00003526697,0.00005014212,0.0003107686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863871,0.0002210685,0.01317471,0.00001449575,0.0001338617,0.000004855466,0.00001701503,0.00001701748,0.00002986283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.264383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5665706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03615124943778165,"score_gpt":0.2591206534561166,"score_spread":0.2229694040183349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}