{"id":"W2135944108","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.03.006","title":"A Multiphase Method for Estimating Cohort Effects in Age-Period Contingency Table Data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Epidemiology","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute on Aging; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism","keywords":"Medicine; Cohort; Demography; Cohort effect; Confidence interval; Interpretability; Homicide; Statistics; Relative risk; Cohort study; Pediatrics; Poison control; Injury prevention; Mathematics; Medical emergency; Internal medicine; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03283839,0.0001769957,0.0008550383,0.0001910531,0.0002546381,0.00001569361,0.0009288106,0.0002374907,0.00003668959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05443912,0.0001730318,0.0001341181,0.0003684305,0.0005123946,0.0002612167,0.000205601,0.0002997821,0.00000532556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008892756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008557855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01530516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01486617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956639,0.001717887,0.0009048935,0.0006522466,0.0001646125,0.0008964046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914064,0.006822598,0.0005551403,0.000879148,0.00019608,0.0001405695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005942348,0.0002466352,0.8372894,0.0002223374,0.0001576538,0.00002113182,0.001383903,0.0003118286,0.0005241431,0.07576431,0.01271831,0.07130095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002340889,0.0003630841,0.5203614,0.0002190047,0.0001974796,0.000003674882,0.0008535917,0.1473091,0.0003532656,0.1269189,0.200113,0.0009666242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6429358,0.001635324,0.3239559,0.008352252,0.00425741,0.005213006,0.0002531421,0.0001915579,0.01320557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3850706,0.0001484973,0.612388,0.001592,0.0003538121,0.0002193512,0.00009821153,0.00001964243,0.0001099528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.316928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1791462010890727,"score_gpt":0.4996249235790265,"score_spread":0.3204787224899538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}