{"id":"W2135992253","doi":"10.1037/a0020379","title":"The sparing is far from spurious: Reevaluating within-trial contingency effects in the attentional blink.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Experimental Psychology Society","keywords":"Attentional blink; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Attentional bias; Rapid serial visual presentation; Contingency; Selection (genetic algorithm); Visual attention; Neuroscience; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001105653,0.0002305496,0.0002757432,0.0001200975,0.001043317,0.0001032713,0.0007908999,0.0001380807,0.0002781605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009434147,0.0001342463,0.0001780656,0.0001834809,0.0006375454,0.0003980965,0.00008305538,0.001311436,0.00008117536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003729378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001597442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001385767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004108614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975651,0.0003270408,0.0008452955,0.0003858866,0.00053496,0.0003417496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986767,0.0002221974,0.0006435505,0.0003365724,0.0000659678,0.00005498499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001439962,0.0004112785,0.02311983,0.000002253702,0.000008870998,0.00002068389,0.00358812,0.000001448964,0.9686104,0.00005608202,0.0009270661,0.001814011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02416651,0.003842115,0.8472977,0.00009984625,0.00006327678,0.0006334247,0.002944205,0.0001290776,0.1172851,0.001107021,0.00196529,0.0004663879],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933782,0.0001474436,0.00000373113,0.001279454,0.004056029,0.0003983966,0.000002028961,0.00001579597,0.0007189032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956636,0.00008241192,0.0001561871,0.002979427,0.0009569474,0.00003658637,0.000001391421,0.00001571892,0.0001077382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8513253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8024456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1460959778843807,"score_gpt":0.4457731890161625,"score_spread":0.2996772111317818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}