{"id":"W2135992253","doi":"10.1037/a0020379","title":"The sparing is far from spurious: Reevaluating within-trial contingency effects in the attentional blink.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Experimental Psychology Society","keywords":"Attentional blink; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Attentional bias; Rapid serial visual presentation; Contingency; Selection (genetic algorithm); Visual attention; Neuroscience; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002024917,0.000269015,0.0003651041,0.000492601,0.0002237314,0.0007538699,0.0005773933,0.0003178422,0.001367269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123593,0.0002159865,0.0002994499,0.0003238484,0.000724213,0.001418157,0.0005978793,0.001253066,0.0001449266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003895547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002912573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001039277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00186272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994882,0.00008868004,0.000036178,0.0001416961,0.0002145072,0.00003070516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930479,0.004026702,0.001042056,0.001390298,0.0002785361,0.0002144253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006835916,0.0007098232,0.0513475,0.0008364607,0.0006289879,0.001275112,0.001945133,0.004706912,0.6667312,0.01685701,0.001412053,0.2467139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002833547,0.002814451,0.7762964,0.0001259144,0.000806174,0.00234597,0.0004154626,0.06078483,0.08982221,0.05991556,0.006252886,0.0001369707],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673477,0.002486525,0.02504275,0.000517161,0.000142447,0.00007733696,0.0001433055,0.0002092316,0.004033627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920012,0.0003325008,0.006700626,0.0001828373,0.0000484564,0.00003245016,0.00008006607,0.00006774168,0.0005540992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002024917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01070893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1460959778843807,"score_gpt":0.4457731890161625,"score_spread":0.2996772111317818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}