{"id":"W2136069275","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00082.x","title":"Are Agricultural Values a Reliable Guide in Determining Landowners' Decisions to Create Forest Carbon Sinks?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Canadian Sport Centre Pacific","funders":"BIOCAP Canada","keywords":"Forestry; Carbon stock; Afforestation; Tree planting; Willingness to accept; Carbon sequestration; Welfare economics; Economics; Agricultural science; Geography; Environmental science; Willingness to pay; Microeconomics; Chemistry; Climate change; Ecology; Nitrogen","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001543938,0.0004496762,0.001097292,0.0009752679,0.0002286124,0.000215912,0.0006841808,0.0002657063,0.0002118635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004292901,0.0004346459,0.0003374167,0.0002837387,0.00009345052,0.0007826314,0.00005654741,0.0004095019,0.0002307898],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005208803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001875531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05356714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.852179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995666,0.00002182764,0.00237565,0.0006536455,0.00001524724,0.001267589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957922,0.0001961978,0.001725988,0.0003505418,0.00008580604,0.001849247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004942074,0.00003555581,0.9440778,0.00001669492,0.0001398141,0.0001429231,0.002030416,0.04271736,0.00004190339,0.00740904,0.002544312,0.0007947774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001093104,0.0002238337,0.9802314,0.0001486568,0.0000243129,0.0002903822,0.003871474,0.000223298,0.00005855579,0.00309596,0.01007103,0.0006679761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861395,0.0004695017,0.00002709183,0.001694909,0.001544924,0.0003976518,0.0001626926,0.00001124357,0.009552429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958035,0.00009988534,0.0007382178,0.0006166237,0.00064144,0.00001679599,0.00004328677,0.00004231659,0.001997885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7986118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06439765839222296,"score_gpt":0.1884604590864771,"score_spread":0.1240628006942542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}