{"id":"W2136369840","doi":"10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2008)22:5(276)","title":"Analytical Evaluation of Seismic Performance of RC Frames Rehabilitated Using FRP for Increased Ductility of Members","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities","topic":"Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Structural engineering; Dissipation; Ductility (Earth science); Fibre-reinforced plastic; Materials science; Displacement (psychology); Failure mode and effects analysis; Geotechnical engineering; Shear strength (soil); Shear (geology); Acceleration; Seismic analysis; Engineering; Composite material; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002986333,0.000419285,0.0002637501,0.0004401202,0.0001907295,0.0001983129,0.0003406589,0.0003537966,0.000521558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004856905,0.0001249323,0.0003599689,0.0002669687,0.0003241576,0.0001931255,0.0001690578,0.0001864143,0.0001804566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004167922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002428095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003202955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006157242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998472,0.00001756697,0.000008610195,0.00002556087,0.00006835377,0.00003281448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997789,0.00006270379,0.00004718591,0.00002040536,0.00007881328,0.00001198474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005827802,0.0001905639,0.01371996,0.000232469,0.00004344404,0.0005259397,0.0003597537,0.1816634,0.7666097,0.0003339713,0.0001322931,0.0356057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001638867,0.00217166,0.08522131,0.00003388563,0.0001268363,0.0002211857,0.0005683812,0.4940846,0.4165847,0.0001603431,0.0007706811,0.00004002447],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966714,0.00006731106,0.002729189,0.000007492977,0.000002268038,0.000007629425,0.00004254849,0.00001859471,0.0004536346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986396,0.00007491279,0.0009225254,0.000001871779,0.000001235492,0.000005093685,0.00004958086,0.000004566228,0.0003005885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003202955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006368577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03483106448183585,"score_gpt":0.262946275886846,"score_spread":0.2281152114050102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}