{"id":"W2136433400","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2005.18779161","title":"HOW DO YOU CLIMB THE CORPORATE LADDER? A MULTI-REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE ETHICAL PREFERENCES FOR INFLUENCING SUPERIORS.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Climb; Consistency (knowledge bases); Predictive power; Power (physics); Conservatism; Social psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001151631,0.0001474727,0.0003086474,0.0001373046,0.0005256158,0.0001070327,0.0008326366,0.000174518,0.00001543755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000765652,0.00009693123,0.0002436742,0.0006640952,0.0009271257,0.0003457857,0.0003031626,0.0002723511,0.000001173214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009847133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002138905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001085387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001488522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986134,0.00003063975,0.0003367586,0.0003049318,0.0004232336,0.0002910241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999138,0.00009097322,0.0005507714,0.00007236053,0.0001024344,0.00004546196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001249414,0.0002326181,0.2194127,0.0001817509,0.002365651,1.166426e-7,0.06421256,0.0001238428,0.003636436,0.6935208,0.004182758,0.01200583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002223472,0.0002079674,0.5026679,0.0003001847,0.005242067,6.470914e-7,0.314891,0.001514586,0.01444439,0.01102735,0.1464516,0.001028816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625159,0.0002721879,0.00001275772,0.03385185,0.00003716755,0.0008332329,0.00001221618,0.00002512982,0.00243958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963635,0.0003992234,0.00139342,0.0008721355,0.00006948228,0.0001466501,0.000001036844,0.000008934684,0.0007456772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6824934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4042665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1145646995940349,"score_gpt":0.3516225746696359,"score_spread":0.237057875075601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}