{"id":"W2136488086","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5915.2004.02465.x","title":"A Comparison of Arbitration Procedures for Risk‐Averse Disputants*","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Sciences","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001238308,0.0000785694,0.0003933786,0.0001932179,0.0002599255,0.00009371977,0.000303702,0.00006618582,0.00004128294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007141882,0.00008709655,0.0001146118,0.0002763301,0.0002617867,0.0003297406,0.00002700775,0.00004364796,0.0001137637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005295591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007056837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003782252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004794402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985188,0.000005224598,0.0008419177,0.0003742477,0.00006593019,0.0001938299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988456,0.0001688077,0.0007230515,0.0001625704,0.00004289842,0.00005711461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004918963,0.0001511819,0.1986764,0.00002220496,0.00001502575,1.924711e-7,0.001380107,0.004684623,0.00005595628,0.7917119,0.0005859905,0.00266724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008947365,0.0003338809,0.02896283,0.00005038919,0.000005306881,0.000001385969,0.0007178246,0.006176068,0.001102046,0.956429,0.005113333,0.000213192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8972702,0.0005996368,0.08870337,0.0001306371,0.000806782,0.0003600173,0.0001433764,0.00001777479,0.01196822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993883,0.00008521753,0.005818949,0.00006612071,0.0001010179,0.00001832464,0.000002570974,0.000006423339,0.00001837596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1697135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3551694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08261345288899215,"score_gpt":0.3258326302162092,"score_spread":0.2432191773272171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}