{"id":"W2136488086","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5915.2004.02465.x","title":"A Comparison of Arbitration Procedures for Risk‐Averse Disputants*","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Sciences","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02650373,0.0005749385,0.002106921,0.002217425,0.001217928,0.003611117,0.002727589,0.003213938,0.003233048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09855731,0.0005329339,0.001249642,0.00142319,0.002573279,0.005922043,0.003147835,0.002680106,0.0004355801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001841261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002479652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001273593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008891947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9797297,0.01346234,0.0009451192,0.001024903,0.003799201,0.001038901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8976502,0.08430198,0.004520103,0.007904653,0.004145333,0.00147775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002250593,0.0008167602,0.004685683,0.0003045356,0.0004110717,0.0001647821,0.0009916971,0.3584026,0.004388654,0.4833405,0.002829356,0.1414138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000184935,0.0003588456,0.001066497,0.00002939626,0.00005458662,0.00008699082,0.0001672084,0.8478636,0.001989856,0.146837,0.001302671,0.00005844556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4402503,0.00108769,0.5432401,0.001768812,0.0001403773,0.000533474,0.0001431012,0.0004378581,0.01239828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471158,0.0001949025,0.05149048,0.00009084561,0.00003718854,0.0001280328,0.000083841,0.00003422279,0.0008247842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02650373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1401668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08261345288899215,"score_gpt":0.3258326302162092,"score_spread":0.2432191773272171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}