{"id":"W2136525356","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00231.x","title":"A precisely dated Proterozoic palaeomagnetic pole from the North China craton, and its relevance to palaeocontinental reconstruction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Journal International","topic":"Geological and Geochemical Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; College of Family Physicians of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Paleomagnetism; Craton; Geology; Laurentia; Zircon; Proterozoic; Paleontology; Remanence; Apparent polar wander; Precambrian; Position (finance); Paleozoic; Magnetization; Tectonics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008197166,0.0001390462,0.0001553236,0.00002966712,0.0002036311,0.0001613678,0.0003348594,0.00003729959,0.01832316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009508927,0.00008234338,0.00009006127,0.0001892948,0.00007001206,0.0002253443,0.00002524909,0.0003109286,0.0006429578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005082658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001383558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001096685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001298443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988255,0.00007504617,0.0002721467,0.000267252,0.0003375614,0.0002225246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994261,0.0001236332,0.00008241516,0.00008598308,0.00007805745,0.0002038326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003175578,0.00008335714,0.545986,0.000002139087,0.0001303527,0.00003241158,0.0001997368,0.001125721,0.00156922,0.00002778657,0.0006550542,0.4498706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000245438,0.0001140359,0.9774488,0.00002174809,0.00002234751,0.0001023559,0.00001480072,0.01122183,0.0001556125,0.008101268,0.002429121,0.0001226005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922761,0.0001465319,0.00002186415,0.006015275,0.000194888,0.000126455,0.0001416556,0.00001753618,0.001059728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976085,0.0001166514,0.0003261362,0.0006056481,0.0006866884,0.000003105639,0.00009800895,0.000002241488,0.0005529717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.449748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005900489680706948,"score_gpt":0.1859096909647011,"score_spread":0.1800092012839942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}