{"id":"W2136556492","doi":"10.5194/gmd-5-1061-2012","title":"A community diagnostic tool for chemistry climate model validation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geoscientific model development","topic":"Atmospheric Ozone and Climate","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration; University of Toronto; European Commission; National Center for Atmospheric Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Model validation; Climate model; Source code; Coding (social sciences); Software engineering; Systems engineering; Data science; Programming language; Climate change; Engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01274858,0.002598659,0.0009365553,0.007243379,0.001379903,0.002528102,0.004562853,0.00250808,0.0413532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05348112,0.001173875,0.00181664,0.002657054,0.0007595884,0.004809161,0.005788149,0.002503201,0.01154126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001501143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003593534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002302702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927245,0.002430676,0.0007743,0.0005931042,0.003174732,0.0003027354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751047,0.01163706,0.001214147,0.003605108,0.007887546,0.000551461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000500098,0.0004517122,0.005541317,0.001335371,0.0002002687,0.001177702,0.0006254063,0.04725635,0.008251732,0.1090311,0.3675764,0.4580525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004064809,0.0001049672,0.001115111,0.0006573971,0.00006881527,0.001271439,0.0001982531,0.5316198,0.01818288,0.09620368,0.3499689,0.000202221],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002901674,0.0002628877,0.8902885,0.0006760988,0.0003411909,0.0006139209,0.00631527,0.0863544,0.01224607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06750413,0.0002905787,0.8848547,0.0007220812,0.0001802493,0.002159144,0.02002307,0.01795159,0.006314499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0413532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1383402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03491138442143191,"score_gpt":0.2355544823085463,"score_spread":0.2006430978871143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}