{"id":"W2136613743","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-246x.2005.02688.x","title":"Experimental comparison of FORC and remanent Preisach diagrams","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Journal International","topic":"Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Remanence; Coercivity; Demagnetizing field; Stoner–Wohlfarth model; Rock magnetism; Condensed matter physics; Magnetite; Single domain; Distribution (mathematics); Smoothing; Materials science; Physics; Magnetic field; Magnetization; Magnetic domain; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001513077,0.0004259747,0.000325969,0.001677552,0.0006551747,0.0006836766,0.000937621,0.0007459753,0.005495987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003907104,0.000244974,0.0001652418,0.001409363,0.0008807867,0.0006456265,0.000330159,0.0007799891,0.0008883884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007121758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002840109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001346668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002276447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988349,0.0001272041,0.00005764802,0.0003595481,0.0004599839,0.0001607796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944437,0.001784923,0.0004402482,0.0007658714,0.002415641,0.0001496361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001393458,0.00005236869,0.001433708,0.0001632418,0.00001586331,0.00007889697,0.0003761868,0.0007079975,0.9819787,0.001207609,0.0006599388,0.01318606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001296363,0.0001376888,0.008806729,0.00002251947,0.00001405914,0.0001876111,0.000170239,0.002948991,0.9819456,0.000418047,0.005306238,0.00002937843],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9122245,0.001657288,0.06164666,0.0002744743,0.0001190534,0.0001595918,0.003069673,0.001829636,0.01901908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717705,0.0004046048,0.02240748,0.00006537385,0.00002172175,0.0001370471,0.001664135,0.0004555571,0.003073507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005495987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01838595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01133221944040589,"score_gpt":0.2895377825060947,"score_spread":0.2782055630656888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}