{"id":"W2136636747","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.003","title":"Characterizing forest succession with lidar data: An evaluation for the Inland Northwest, USA","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing of Environment","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":335,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Geological Survey; International Institute of Tropical Forestry; U.S. Forest Service; Sustainable Forestry Initiative","keywords":"Lidar; Ecological succession; Basal area; Remote sensing; Forest inventory; Vegetation (pathology); Canopy; Forest ecology; Environmental science; Forest management; Random forest; Forest structure; Wildlife; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003231498,0.0005873702,0.0005138603,0.0009404756,0.0006434988,0.0008436916,0.0006957047,0.0005616123,0.0005480782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004491678,0.0002497116,0.0004736441,0.001269545,0.0002536311,0.0009230209,0.0004583432,0.0002355649,0.0001598042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009952177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001004796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07773931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1861977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992856,0.000238024,0.00005087988,0.0001141288,0.0002589342,0.00005242694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965675,0.001469035,0.0002365819,0.000241883,0.001274158,0.000210931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002545462,0.001665036,0.8241213,0.0001737259,0.0003690723,0.0002675268,0.0002621865,0.03964696,0.01403708,0.000162735,0.001168301,0.1155806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002875134,0.00130272,0.627034,0.00003658409,0.0003690527,0.0002969488,0.0008724661,0.3542898,0.01369704,0.0001901469,0.001582955,0.00004067847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965496,0.00007501402,0.002032622,0.00002908067,0.000004303642,0.00006800064,0.0006163208,0.00008858871,0.0005364346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803455,0.0001737812,0.01702114,0.00003611276,0.000006689855,0.00006528528,0.001874463,0.0000245225,0.000452467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07773931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1545736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03385452860308631,"score_gpt":0.2791681637636153,"score_spread":0.245313635160529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}