{"id":"W2136716586","doi":"10.3138/tjt.26.1.75","title":"Schellenberg's Newman Lecture on Contemporary Philosophy of Religion: Responses and Reply","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Catholicism and Religious Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Philosophy; State (computer science); Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy of religion; Contemporary philosophy; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Library science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003318331,0.0001299303,0.0003753548,0.00007732457,0.0001560962,0.00001841884,0.0001530938,0.0000715861,0.0002472806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001303644,0.0000849892,0.000119977,0.000008594405,0.0006657193,0.000113531,0.00005500498,0.0002614976,0.000003979416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001239836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005277101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009761804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00181366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991779,0.00008485689,0.0003812599,0.0001083831,0.0001238033,0.0001238352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989392,0.0002348048,0.0003845916,0.0001846636,0.0002004728,0.00005627331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002243423,0.0001154343,0.0003133765,0.00003740674,0.0002001125,0.00005429091,0.03132721,0.000001302291,0.001570835,0.867373,0.09601216,0.0007514122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001468662,0.002876762,0.0005261286,0.0001183446,0.00008709531,0.0004421776,0.001356159,0.000001617344,0.0008294901,0.1916806,0.8003821,0.000230844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6357753,0.03164678,0.000006733645,0.008825907,0.003151612,0.000122457,0.0000152067,0.00002089785,0.3204351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992353,0.001817268,0.00007526822,0.001144999,0.002115826,0.000001016604,5.687763e-7,0.00001219762,0.002479866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.70437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3465759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02155693799958554,"score_gpt":0.2509157113837887,"score_spread":0.2293587733842031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}