{"id":"W2136777787","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2008.19525","title":"The Effect of Evidence-Based Drug Coverage Policies on Pharmaceutical R&D: A Case Study from British Columbia - Abridged Version -","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare policy","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drug; Political science; Operations research; Medicine; Pharmacology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089507,0.0002413963,0.000731652,0.0001765393,0.0009119862,0.0002226831,0.0003996996,0.000121706,0.0001903212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007913751,0.0002739688,0.0002583054,0.0004194971,0.0002769738,0.0001755877,0.0001223714,0.0005023218,0.0003531779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004835798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002395746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6983774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04468936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972863,0.0003438951,0.0009890675,0.0005630729,0.0001156641,0.0007019734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964377,0.001989641,0.0004043974,0.0006547885,0.0000538662,0.0004596141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007449373,0.0006062841,0.9254246,0.0002307459,0.000230464,0.0007962443,0.001680477,0.0001502495,0.00001679731,0.002342227,0.05290066,0.0148763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01895542,0.005028459,0.3607115,0.000497607,0.0001300685,0.001289595,0.0002819432,0.005246554,0.0007444157,0.007428689,0.5975177,0.002168075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753509,0.002472739,0.000007798835,0.01861018,0.0003822735,0.000981514,0.001541037,0.00005346187,0.0006000993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890267,0.002464694,0.00001192403,0.007353802,0.0005238204,0.00008683313,0.00002115244,0.00004692922,0.0004641615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.653688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1833474251110272,"score_gpt":0.3864817549760108,"score_spread":0.2031343298649837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}