{"id":"W2136892597","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.016","title":"Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Expert opinion; Argumentative; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01757804,0.0009367151,0.0008176651,0.001908903,0.002884076,0.007946662,0.003066608,0.004146606,0.01094854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04732326,0.0007870774,0.001393318,0.001026835,0.005728,0.008376559,0.008199554,0.003469363,0.001135252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001691082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00333503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002847535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003174641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840686,0.01329005,0.0005818045,0.0006037499,0.001151452,0.0003043591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633461,0.03087993,0.001043311,0.001571719,0.002129209,0.001029704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007565673,0.0001957721,0.001107633,0.000818491,0.0001188613,0.0009291295,0.02462509,0.01160611,0.004321421,0.8052385,0.01365739,0.1366251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707825,0.0001683648,0.0007015589,0.0005250464,0.0002078854,0.0005290697,0.004961194,0.1493654,0.005500477,0.7119784,0.1256045,0.0001874161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005727736,0.0002228311,0.9806285,0.002567649,0.0001424255,0.0003316518,0.0001128908,0.0005144501,0.009751908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2870265,0.0001826205,0.7023066,0.0004563478,0.000116324,0.0006784353,0.0002846843,0.0002128772,0.008735757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01757804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09296262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03496806484847136,"score_gpt":0.3467371194531408,"score_spread":0.3117690546046695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}