{"id":"W2136956023","doi":"10.1080/00346764.2010.517631","title":"Freedom to Choose and Choice X-inefficiencies: Human and Consumer Rights, and Positive and Normative Implications of Choice Behavior","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Social Economy","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Satisficing; Normative; Freedom of choice; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Microeconomics; Consumer choice; Public choice; Rational choice theory (criminology); Preference; Narrative; Public good; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010515,0.0001600704,0.0006606066,0.0001457806,0.0003087157,0.0001137827,0.0002392708,0.00008667322,0.0001086356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000528237,0.0001287518,0.00006595745,0.0002053052,0.0006655926,0.0003565419,0.0002097949,0.0001507672,0.000008553224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001611967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004418604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003670335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003484008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984423,0.00006500671,0.0008092099,0.0004080868,0.0001261198,0.0001492585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976614,0.001026459,0.0005384017,0.0002647863,0.0003422162,0.0001668143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001061612,0.0002460706,0.0779122,0.0003717188,0.00004356296,9.936828e-7,0.00337198,2.468746e-7,0.001996486,0.01299384,0.003697801,0.8993545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006021314,0.0001367973,0.8933373,0.0004706158,0.0001937133,0.00002498427,0.0004182272,0.00001511927,0.0001565754,0.008800088,0.09548905,0.0003553714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926534,0.003222382,0.00002114186,0.0007158452,0.00004924749,0.0005677161,0.0001617006,0.000007032816,0.00260156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978471,0.0007553242,0.0008394751,0.0003773035,0.00005290821,0.00004109953,0.000005598568,0.000008442778,0.00007270334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8989991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5250344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05603001922893941,"score_gpt":0.4096632435114257,"score_spread":0.3536332242824863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}