{"id":"W2136991564","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009368","title":"Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö; Suomen Kulttuurirahasto; Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö; Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö","keywords":"Medicine; Missing data; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Reporting bias; Publication bias; Cochrane Library; Relative risk; Confidence interval; Statistics; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8240169,0.003839936,0.0114697,0.03643627,0.004162171,0.01362374,0.007396671,0.008074379,0.002027066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9051765,0.005893077,0.02103326,0.03101224,0.01139582,0.02082289,0.01165761,0.006498254,0.001049074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01393787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04312714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005142113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006629927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.06552667,0.5568924,0.3207532,0.007077564,0.0485549,0.001195263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04847329,0.6615772,0.1567958,0.02976552,0.1020779,0.001310393],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002020233,0.0002021895,0.05904761,0.4600301,0.02656727,0.0004065481,0.03166685,0.003795011,0.002448788,0.01850603,0.01278482,0.3825245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002595472,0.002546515,0.03127117,0.7606799,0.03311643,0.003873282,0.01114731,0.01144775,0.005570655,0.05449787,0.08143979,0.001813981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02201305,0.4493864,0.4112723,0.04097031,0.004040183,0.06470156,0.002945147,0.001005908,0.003665179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1182147,0.1373901,0.622758,0.009598838,0.001978434,0.1070613,0.001894389,0.000352586,0.0007516433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1759831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2170186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9942439294609863,"score_gpt":0.7377356540891176,"score_spread":0.2565082753718687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}