{"id":"W2137028216","doi":"10.1007/s11273-013-9322-6","title":"Is rewetting enough to recover Sphagnum and associated peat-accumulating species in traditionally exploited bogs?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wetlands Ecology and Management","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bog; Peat; Sphagnum; Dominance (genetics); Environmental science; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Ombrotrophic; Plant community; Ecological succession; Hydrology (agriculture); Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003545067,0.0001878261,0.0002649901,0.0001256015,0.0002029297,0.00005691712,0.0001234874,0.0001226327,0.003143038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004772596,0.0001765581,0.00002967192,0.000209599,0.00008622761,0.0002242948,0.0003160461,0.0001308359,0.000151472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003450838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002480757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002517243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985313,0.00007661204,0.0003130661,0.0004820011,0.0001282043,0.0004687586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995083,0.0001304456,0.0000882864,0.00013798,0.000007992687,0.0001270057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002071015,0.00009969487,0.9790539,0.00001745893,0.00004383175,0.00003800491,0.0005474859,0.00007307364,0.000256675,0.0004133806,0.01668385,0.002751924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009999053,0.00019108,0.9845511,0.0000197847,0.00001834178,0.000007679661,0.000314983,0.000769318,0.00001506595,0.001129024,0.01176843,0.0002152374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9657474,0.00001561517,0.00003353987,0.004869835,0.0001135857,0.0005291905,0.000008783931,0.00003622092,0.02864583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909096,0.000216147,0.000861659,0.003426743,0.0000361751,0.0001701559,0.00004731373,0.00001312683,0.004319057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02516222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01603793491148383,"score_gpt":0.2219801620935793,"score_spread":0.2059422271820955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}