{"id":"W2137116131","doi":"10.5558/tfc86036-1","title":"Intensive biomass removals and site productivity in Canada: A review of relevant issues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Canadian Sport Centre Pacific; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Productivity; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Logging; Ecosystem services; Psychological resilience; Bioenergy; Forest management; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biofuel; Forestry; Geography; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002117521,0.0008206102,0.001648405,0.007068114,0.001381421,0.003356835,0.001438053,0.001352261,0.002560666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004236714,0.0004530753,0.0009544956,0.0169202,0.00207917,0.001310671,0.000783447,0.001727727,0.0003087337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02386418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05707943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8400406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9066419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989775,0.00008345701,0.0001748051,0.0001493646,0.0004902362,0.0001245044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927655,0.003105148,0.0009219981,0.00008521645,0.002727542,0.0003944888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022592,0.0001420006,0.007468326,0.04893199,0.0003724689,0.0003933216,0.0006308437,0.0007942651,0.0004213244,0.004205958,0.03416773,0.9022458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003100035,0.000262508,0.08981831,0.08921344,0.001679218,0.001728476,0.002071141,0.0004559776,0.0005333578,0.002069684,0.8119481,0.0001888648],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003091917,0.9985437,0.00002187169,0.0004600648,0.00009486841,0.000002840029,0.00005879581,0.000001751897,0.0005068651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002691154,0.9966815,0.00005420485,0.0002644442,0.00009621926,0.000003552789,0.00004800937,0.000001863261,0.0001590497],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1599594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3218029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01497070494184711,"score_gpt":0.2646207650469203,"score_spread":0.2496500601050732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}