{"id":"W2137266151","doi":"10.1364/ol.32.001366","title":"Visibility interference fringes optimization on a single beam in the case of partially polarized and partially coherent light","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optics Letters","topic":"Photonic and Optical Devices","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cegep de Saint Jerome","funders":"","keywords":"Optics; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Interference (communication); Polarization (electrochemistry); Physics; Light beam; Visibility; Homodyne detection; Mutual coherence; Ray; Computer science; Telecommunications; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003932489,0.0001152228,0.0001455853,0.00005215143,0.0000278237,0.00004007723,0.0001053029,0.00005408625,0.000008559413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005358036,0.00008874009,0.00002711005,0.0001138494,0.00005575382,0.00007107858,0.00002410052,0.0001564698,0.00000152767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000364414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005386512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003122265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003450591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992663,0.00002752096,0.0002676725,0.000141685,0.00009263695,0.0002042436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995295,0.0001770727,0.00003562863,0.0001917906,0.00001850051,0.000047535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003344399,0.0006011566,0.00283326,0.0003752071,0.0001194696,0.0008612355,0.00641914,0.5383009,0.4415873,0.004029451,0.00006752382,0.004470897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001666153,0.0005690294,0.006163397,0.0003040315,0.00009892164,0.0001350746,0.0008718377,0.8480617,0.1411596,0.0001530315,0.00020114,0.0006160763],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535469,0.00006260629,0.04435134,0.0004700531,0.00009085082,0.0001806266,0.000003461659,0.00003290716,0.001261234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962515,0.00001513623,0.003352171,0.0003381436,0.00002367162,0.000005234525,0.000002363928,0.0000105544,0.000001264576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3097608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3618716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01354828008707844,"score_gpt":0.2310699338268351,"score_spread":0.2175216537397566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}