{"id":"W2137266151","doi":"10.1364/ol.32.001366","title":"Visibility interference fringes optimization on a single beam in the case of partially polarized and partially coherent light","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optics Letters","topic":"Photonic and Optical Devices","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cegep de Saint Jerome","funders":"","keywords":"Optics; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Interference (communication); Polarization (electrochemistry); Physics; Light beam; Visibility; Homodyne detection; Mutual coherence; Ray; Computer science; Telecommunications; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007275534,0.0008524737,0.0008467622,0.0005759337,0.000344161,0.0008134968,0.0005634022,0.000592828,0.0009100951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001402557,0.0003482174,0.0004690407,0.0006271424,0.001368276,0.0007867478,0.0006671361,0.0003670673,0.0001547454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009058831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004830776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001059562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001039539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994674,0.0001606462,0.00001515911,0.00007132286,0.00018741,0.00009800535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994189,0.0002660596,0.0001356495,0.00005904172,0.00006947109,0.00005089225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009105091,0.0001182524,0.001260731,0.0003100473,0.0001422629,0.0005396897,0.0001857194,0.4794934,0.246439,0.242218,0.0008888958,0.02749349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008935146,0.0001568363,0.001161388,0.00002136066,0.00004429677,0.0001576549,0.0000473898,0.9033216,0.05787001,0.03622792,0.0008499486,0.00005215046],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5751162,0.001107936,0.4064915,0.000371339,0.00003478821,0.00005237745,0.0001441154,0.0002384611,0.0164434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521865,0.0004280107,0.04606767,0.00001924011,0.00001803818,0.00005353913,0.00006056991,0.00007089612,0.001095628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001059562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006572723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01354828008707844,"score_gpt":0.2310699338268351,"score_spread":0.2175216537397566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}