{"id":"W2137274029","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2009.11.002","title":"Contrasting two approaches in real options valuation: Contingent claims versus dynamic programming","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Futures contract; Valuation (finance); Convenience yield; Economics; Dynamic programming; Discounting; Constant (computer programming); Econometrics; Yield (engineering); Investment (military); Actuarial science; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Spot contract; Financial economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051898,0.0001505923,0.0005147828,0.0004580494,0.00008641032,0.0001409563,0.0001995594,0.00007843009,0.00002314296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005503916,0.0001644847,0.0002803253,0.0001806649,0.00004801068,0.0005504818,0.00001882002,0.0002258255,0.00002611505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003984412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004375113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001123323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008110924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981935,0.00001711021,0.00127216,0.0002122937,0.00003319634,0.0002717257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984561,0.00007463971,0.001169456,0.0001552913,0.00004234879,0.0001021838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001286928,0.0002229935,0.05396435,0.000007320933,0.0001394466,0.000009046978,0.0005679879,0.03578012,0.000004232902,0.9009256,0.00001972206,0.008230511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008247348,0.0009050765,0.2781717,0.00006574576,0.0001505423,0.00004318323,0.001172289,0.3590154,0.00001772499,0.3490781,0.002463786,0.0006691414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909261,0.00479905,0.0005427894,0.0006756923,0.0004729497,0.0001555806,0.00000826017,0.00001041263,0.002409139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904277,0.004544233,0.004658838,0.00004117214,0.0002216945,0.000004382727,0.00001629428,0.00001359958,0.00007203705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5518475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6707492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09980356780401368,"score_gpt":0.2776634206280657,"score_spread":0.177859852824052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}