{"id":"W2137333579","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00697.x","title":"A qualitative examination of changing practice in Canadian neonatal intensive care units","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Nursing education and management","field":"Nursing","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Focus group; Consistency (knowledge bases); Neonatal intensive care unit; Qualitative research; Nursing; Content analysis; Exploratory research; Health care; Multidisciplinary approach; Organizational culture; Psychology; Intensive care; Process (computing); Medicine; Medical education; Public relations; Pediatrics; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01333281,0.0004581423,0.000564569,0.00478717,0.01849525,0.00352871,0.002385398,0.001305475,0.002497919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02634644,0.0004689204,0.000374823,0.005973973,0.008707148,0.001599399,0.003536195,0.001198138,0.0001557266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05790919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06084726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6713194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7671905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9866507,0.0070852,0.0005014047,0.0008280172,0.002653688,0.002281007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715881,0.01702607,0.001896293,0.0006284273,0.006699416,0.002161828],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003729385,0.00002338005,0.004816974,0.0002164532,0.000002481639,0.0007304035,0.9833058,0.00005077229,0.0004921902,0.0006795133,0.0005250543,0.009119719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005111221,0.00004019911,0.01018886,0.0002548952,0.00000442736,0.000164058,0.9798808,0.000101017,0.0003170907,0.0001156278,0.008913274,0.00001482561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823859,0.0007783271,0.002220616,0.002379506,0.00007120455,0.0007012601,0.0004371237,0.00002582161,0.01100032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989926,0.0009667374,0.003048519,0.0005105875,0.00001906828,0.0005125498,0.0001739035,0.00001498876,0.004827657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3286806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6612326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2000395507189995,"score_gpt":0.5690108412419768,"score_spread":0.3689712905229772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}