{"id":"W2137498254","doi":"","title":"Problems created in attenuation-corrected SPECT images by artifacts in attenuation maps: a simulation study.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Attenuation; Correction for attenuation; Computer science; Visibility; Transmission (telecommunications); Image quality; Truncation (statistics); Monte Carlo method; Computer vision; Sample (material); Artificial intelligence; Ground truth; Medical physics; Optics; Mathematics; Physics; Statistics; Image (mathematics); Machine learning; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006262132,0.0001444864,0.0002491281,0.0002579556,0.00003556101,0.00003072932,0.00008392837,0.0000669671,0.0000614041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005439681,0.0001334585,0.00003192211,0.000730091,0.00003851374,0.0001733386,0.00002623707,0.0002528416,0.0000345904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002503748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002847242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003738334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002070801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984291,0.00008161552,0.0004989029,0.0003461798,0.0003153725,0.0003288087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992667,0.0001223105,0.0001152801,0.0002730587,0.00009008944,0.0001325793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001674412,0.004588568,0.5556436,0.00007301244,0.00004403967,0.00002615203,0.001139717,0.002846879,0.004857244,0.00002808305,0.02408354,0.4065017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002432477,0.00005710822,0.9572182,0.00007891843,0.0000407049,0.000004747202,0.0001029095,0.03233166,0.00230315,0.0001642196,0.005081839,0.0001840174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803633,0.0000715403,0.001680205,0.01132852,0.0000310777,0.004947301,0.00001050712,0.0002681139,0.001299451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940463,0.00002102015,0.0007972686,0.0003880773,0.00008657634,0.003607537,0.0002539785,0.00002270712,0.0007765259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4063177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5442278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03370530815422852,"score_gpt":0.2999550546412199,"score_spread":0.2662497464869914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}